Species Use Database

Wild Boar
Sus scrofa

Used for Scientific Research, Recreation and Monetary in Israel

A. Species

Scientific name: Sus scrofa

Common name(s): Wild Boar

Global IUCN Red List Threat Status: Least Concern


B. Location of use

Geographic location(s):

  • Israel

Country/Region:


C. Scale of assessment

Scale of assessment: Sub-national / Sub-region / Sub-State

Name/Details of location: Carmel Coastal Mountain Range, Israel


D. Timescale of use

Start Year: 2016

End Year: 2018


E. Information about the use

How is the wild species sourced?: Wild species sourced from its natural habitat

Type of use: Extractive

Practice of use: Hunting and/or Trapping of live terrestrial and aerial animals

Lethal or non-lethal: Lethal

Does this use involve take/extraction of: The whole entire organism

Purpose(s) of end use: Scientific Research, Recreation and Monetary

Motivation of use: Basic subsistence, Income generation from trade (individual/household/community) and Largescale commercial exploitation for trade

Is this use legal or illegal?: Illegal under national law and not recorded


F. Information about the Users

Which stakeholder(s) does the record primarily focus on?: Non-local Internal


G. Information about the sustainability of use

Is there evidence that the use is having an impact on the target species?: Wild species sourced from its natural habitat

Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from an ecological perspective been recorded?: not recorded

Details of assessment carried out: CITES Livelihood Case Study findings

Brief summary on why the use has been assessed/judged to be sustainable or unsustainable: A project is being put in place that aims to make the use sustainable, but as of the study it has yet to be implemented. Meanwhile, the illegal manner of poaching is still widespread and commonly used

Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from an economic perspective been recorded?: not recorded

Details of assessment carried out: CITES Livelihood Case Study Findings

Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from a social perspective been recorded?: not recorded

Brief summary on why the use has been assessed/judged to be sustainable or unsustainable: While the record

Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from a human health perspective been recorded?: not recorded

Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from an animal health/welfare perspective been recorded?: not recorded


Recommendations provided in the record to maintain or enhance the sustainability of the use of the target species

Limit poaching and hunting


Record source

Information about the record source: scientific_pub

Date of publication/issue/production: 2021-01-01T00:00:00+0000

Source Reference(s):

September 3, 2021
Achiad Davidson, Dan Malkinson, Anat Schonblum, Lee Koren, Uri Shanas

Date of record entry: 2024-07-25