Species Use Database

European eel
Anguilla anguilla

Used for Food and feed in Sweden

A. Species

Scientific name: Anguilla anguilla

Common name(s): European eel

Global IUCN Red List Threat Status: Critically Endangered


B. Location of use

Geographic location(s):

  • Sweden

Country/Region:


C. Scale of assessment

Scale of assessment: National Level

Name/Details of location: Swedish waterways


D. Timescale of use

Start Year: 2007

End Year: 2008


E. Information about the use

How is the wild species sourced?: Wild species sourced from its natural habitat

Type of use: Extractive

Practice of use: Targeted fishing harvesting/exploiting or collecting wild aquatic resources

Lethal or non-lethal: Lethal

Does this use involve take/extraction of: The whole entire organism

Purpose(s) of end use: Food and feed

Motivation of use: Basic subsistence and Income generation from trade (individual/household/community)

Is this use legal or illegal?: Legal under national law


F. Information about the Users

Which stakeholder(s) does the record primarily focus on?: Local people, National / local private sector and International private sector


G. Information about the sustainability of use

Is there evidence that the use is having an impact on the target species?: Wild species sourced from its natural habitat

Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from an ecological perspective been recorded?: No, sustainability not determined

Details of assessment carried out: CITES Non detriment findings

Brief summary on why the use has been assessed/judged to be sustainable or unsustainable: The lack of reliable and absolute data on the eel population is a constraining factor and generally indirect and relative trends and indices have to be employed. When trying to use the IUCN checklist it becomes clear that the population is in bad status mainly with concern to a low human tolerance, negative population trends, major threats, no catch quotas, no protected areas, low confidence in harvest management and a lacking protection. However, more and better data will become available in Europe within a few years when the EMPs and DCR have been fully implemented and operational. The EC Eel Regulation and the coming national EMPs will hopefully improve the situation mainly through a better protection, monitoring and control.

Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from an economic perspective been recorded?: No, sustainability not determined

Details of assessment carried out: CITES Non detriment findings

Brief summary on why the use has been assessed/judged to be sustainable or unsustainable: economic sustainability dependent on ecological sustainability, which can currently not be guaranteed due to lack of data

Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from a social perspective been recorded?: not recorded

Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from a human health perspective been recorded?: not recorded

Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from an animal health/welfare perspective been recorded?: not recorded


Recommendations provided in the record to maintain or enhance the sustainability of the use of the target species

A panmictic population that has declined to very low levels as the European eel cannot be managed on a local or national scale. Instead potential surpluses on a local scale may counterbalance deficits in other areas. This can be done through restocking suitable areas of high qualities for eel survival and growth with free access to the sea with glass eels from areas where glass eels still occur in abundance (above carrying capacity). Correspondingly, compliance with set targets (by the European Council) may well be assessed using both local indicators as well as stock wide indicators compiled by the EICAC/ICES Eel Working Group. A first natural checkpoint will be in 2012 when the EU Commission will make their first evaluation of the measures in action. This occasion seems appropriate also to reconsider if a NDF is possible on the species level making full use of all new data and experience made available through the monitoring required by the EC Regulation.


Record source

Information about the record source: formal_data_stats

Date of publication/issue/production: 2008-01-01T00:00:00+0000

Source Reference(s):

NDF WORKSHOP CASE STUDIES, WG 8 – Fishes, CASE STUDY 2. Wickström (2008). NON DETRIMENT FINDINGS FOR THE EUROPEAN EEL - THE SWEDISH CASE

Date of record entry: 2023-10-05