A. Species
Scientific name: Lamna nasus
Common name(s): Porbeagle shark
Global IUCN Red List Threat Status: Vulnerable
B. Location of use
Geographic location(s):
- New Zealand
- Pacific - southwest
Country/Region:
C. Scale of assessment
Scale of assessment: National Level
Name/Details of location: Waters under New Zealand jurisdiction
D. Timescale of use
Start Year: 1997
End Year: 2013
E. Information about the use
How is the wild species sourced?: Wild species sourced from its natural habitat
Type of use: Extractive
Practice of use: Targeted fishing harvesting/exploiting or collecting wild aquatic resources
Lethal or non-lethal: Lethal
Does this use involve take/extraction of: The whole entire organism
Purpose(s) of end use: Food and feed
Motivation of use: Largescale commercial exploitation for trade
Is this use legal or illegal?: Some use is legal and some is illegal
F. Information about the Users
Which stakeholder(s) does the record primarily focus on?: National / local government, National / local private sector and International private sector
G. Information about the sustainability of use
Is there evidence that the use is having an impact on the target species?: Wild species sourced from its natural habitat
Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from an ecological perspective been recorded?: Yes, considered sustainable
Details of assessment carried out: CITES NDF Report
Brief summary on why the use has been assessed/judged to be sustainable or unsustainable: Some of the indicators, such as increasing CPUE in both fisheries and a decrease in the number of zero catches in the northern fishery, suggest positive trends for porbeagle.
Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from an economic perspective been recorded?: not recorded
Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from a social perspective been recorded?: not recorded
Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from a human health perspective been recorded?: not recorded
Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from an animal health/welfare perspective been recorded?: not recorded
Recommendations provided in the record to maintain or enhance the sustainability of the use of the target species
Recommendations to improve the NDF process: 1. Species-specific data continue to be collected on fishing effort; the number, weight, sex, age, total fork length of all porbeagle landed, and those discarded alive or dead. 2. The recreational and customary take under the QMS is estimated through survey of recreational and customary fishers. 3. Increase observer coverage of domestic longline vessels midwater trawl vessels and New Zealand-flagged high seas vessels, especially those operating in areas where porbeagle are often caught. 4. The type of indicator-based analysis performed by Francis et al (2014) should be repeated at 3-5 yearly intervals, and the models improved with more data and testing. Once sufficient data are available, a quantitative stock assessment should be made in conjunction with other countries in the region. 5. Given the increasing proportional importance of bycatch of porbeagle in midwater trawl and bottom longline fisheries, a similar analysis of those porbeagle catches should be conducted. 6. Review, research and implement best practice mitigation methods to minimise captures of porbeagle in each fishery. 7. Research, develop and implement specific methods for handling and releasing porbeagles, and investigate the fate of live discards by tagging a sample from different fisheries, including recreational and customary fisheries. 8. The volumes of porbeagle product introduced from the high seas to New Zealand be monitored closely, and expert advice be sought before the 4 tonne (greenweight or equivalent greenweight estimates using the current porbeagle conversion multipliers of 108 for dried fins and 45 for wet fins) limit above is allowed to be exceeded. 9. New Zealand collaborates with Oceania neighbours, and especially with WCPFC, to better understand the movements and population dynamics of porbeagle moving in and out of the New Zealand EEZ, and especially into other national fishing jurisdictions. At present there is doubt that porbeagle are actually caught in other Pacific fisheries apart from Australia. If necessary, WCPFC establish regional quota to cover the take of porbeagle on the high seas.
Record source
Information about the record source: scientific_pub
Date of publication/issue/production: 2018-01-01T00:00:00+0000
Source Reference(s):
Hugh A Robertson
New Zealand Scientific Authority for CITES
Science & Policy Group
Department of Conservation
NEW ZEALAND
Date of record entry: 2023-09-14