A. Species
Scientific name: Ursus arctos horriblis
Common name(s): Grizzly bear
Global IUCN Red List Threat Status:
B. Location of use
Geographic location(s):
- Canada
Country/Region:
C. Scale of assessment
Scale of assessment: National Level
Name/Details of location: Canada
D. Timescale of use
Start Year: 2014
End Year: 2014
E. Information about the use
How is the wild species sourced?: Wild species sourced from its natural habitat
Type of use: Extractive
Practice of use: Hunting and/or Trapping of live terrestrial and aerial animals
Lethal or non-lethal: Lethal
Does this use involve take/extraction of: The whole entire organism
Purpose(s) of end use: Collection / Display and Conservation Management
Motivation of use: Largescale commercial exploitation for trade and Population/Area Management
Is this use legal or illegal?: Legal under national law
F. Information about the Users
Which stakeholder(s) does the record primarily focus on?: National / local government
G. Information about the sustainability of use
Is there evidence that the use is having an impact on the target species?: Wild species sourced from its natural habitat
Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from an ecological perspective been recorded?: Yes, considered sustainable
Brief summary on why the use has been assessed/judged to be sustainable or unsustainable: "Export of legally obtained grizzly bear is considered non-detrimental.. Grizzly bear is harvested as a big game animal species under the authorization of hunting permits or licenses. Harvest of grizzly bear occurs throughout its range in Yukon, Northwest Territories, Nunavut and in portions of its range in British Columbia. There is no harvest allowed in Alberta. In Canada, a massive range contraction occurred in the historical past but in recent times the grizzly bear range size has been stable and is estimated at 2 980 000 km2. The 2010 Wild Species General Status assessed grizzly bear as Sensitive overall, and Sensitive in all Canadian jurisdictions except in Alberta where it is classified as May be at Risk and in Saskatchewan and Manitoba where it is classified as Extirpated. Based on the updated 2012 status report of the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC), there are two designatable units of grizzly bear: the Western Population (Yukon, Northwest Territories, Nunavut, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba) is considered to be Special Concern and the Ungava Population (northern Québec and Labrador) is considered to be Extinct. The Western Population is presumed to be stable overall. Habitat loss, habitat degradation, and bear-human conflicts are threats to grizzly bear in Canada. Like all vertebrates in Canada, the grizzly bear is legally protected through various provincial and territorial Wildlife Acts. Under these acts, certain uses of Canadian wildlife are allowed under specific regulations and only with the provision of licenses or permits. Generally, without such a license or permit, the catch, possession, trade, sale, disturbance or destruction of wildlife is prohibited. Regulations also allow for removal of grizzly bear due to bear-human conflict as necessary. Provincial and territorial governments are responsible for the management of terrestrial wildlife. Grizzly bear harvest activities in Canada occur under programs established for game animals and management decisions are guided by planning processes, policy, legislation, trends in historical and recent use, scientific information and Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge. Grizzly bear harvest is managed through an adaptive management framework and is adjusted to ensure sustainable management of the grizzly bear by season, geographical management unit and harvest limit."
Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from an economic perspective been recorded?: not recorded
Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from a social perspective been recorded?: not recorded
Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from a human health perspective been recorded?: not recorded
Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from an animal health/welfare perspective been recorded?: not recorded
Recommendations provided in the record to maintain or enhance the sustainability of the use of the target species
Record source
Information about the record source: formal_data_stats
Date of publication/issue/production: 2014-01-01T00:00:00+0000
Source Reference(s):
Date of record entry: 2023-06-12