Species Use Database

Frankincense, Oilbanum
Boswellia spp.

Used for Medicine and hygiene, Ceremony and ritual expression, Decorative and aesthetic and Fragrance manufacturing chiefly for incense and perfumery in Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Sudan, Somalia, South Sudan and Uganda

A. Species

Scientific name: Boswellia spp.

Common name(s): Frankincense, Oilbanum

Global IUCN Red List Threat Status:


B. Location of use

Geographic location(s):

  • Djibouti
  • Eritrea
  • Ethiopia
  • Kenya
  • Sudan
  • Somalia
  • South Sudan
  • Uganda

Country/Region: Horn of Africa / y Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan and Uganda


C. Scale of assessment

Scale of assessment: Regional/Continental/Multi-country level

Name/Details of location: y Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan and Uganda


D. Timescale of use

Start Year: 2003

End Year: 2017


E. Information about the use

How is the wild species sourced?: Wild species sourced from its natural habitat

Type of use: Extractive

Practice of use: Gathering/Cutting/Collecting terrestrial plants and fungi or their products from the wild

Lethal or non-lethal: Non-Lethal

Does this use involve take/extraction of: Only parts or products of the organism

Purpose(s) of end use: Medicine and hygiene, Ceremony and ritual expression, Decorative and aesthetic and Fragrance manufacturing chiefly for incense and perfumery

Motivation of use: Income generation from trade (individual/household/community) and Largescale commercial exploitation for trade

Is this use legal or illegal?: Some use is legal and some is illegal


F. Information about the Users

Which stakeholder(s) does the record primarily focus on?: Local people, National / local private sector and International private sector


G. Information about the sustainability of use

Is there evidence that the use is having an impact on the target species?: Wild species sourced from its natural habitat

Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from an ecological perspective been recorded?: Yes, considered unsustainable

Details of assessment carried out: This study

Brief summary on why the use has been assessed/judged to be sustainable or unsustainable: The decline in commercially important tree species with a subsequent deterioration of rural livelihood opportunities has been attributed to ecosystem degradation caused by drought, excessive fuelwood harvesting and overgrazing, as well as to land conversion, improper resin tapping methods and insect damage. The study argues that, due to the decline in the populations of these tree species, the sustainability of frankincense and myrrh production is at risk.

Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from an economic perspective been recorded?: Yes, considered unsustainable

Details of assessment carried out: this study

Brief summary on why the use has been assessed/judged to be sustainable or unsustainable: Despite being socio-economically important, and a source of medicinal ingredients, because these species are not ecologically sustainable, the current industrial exploitations of these resources cannot be sustainable. This review study explains that although several scientific studies have been conducted regarding the socio-economic and ecological importance of Boswellia and Commiphora species, none of them has systematically evaluated the socio-economic contributions of aromatic resins to national and regional economies. However, this study concludes that that proper commercialization and value-chain development of frankincense and myrrh are significant economic incentives to manage the dryland ecosystems sustainably, and that Boswellia and Commiphora species as integrated components of agro-silvo-pastoral systems could significantly contribute to rural livelihoods and improve adaptability to climate change in the Horn of Africa.

Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from a social perspective been recorded?: Yes, considered unsustainable

Details of assessment carried out: this study

Brief summary on why the use has been assessed/judged to be sustainable or unsustainable: Despite being socio-economically important, and a source of medicinal ingredients, because these species are not ecologically sustainable, the current industrial exploitations of these resources cannot be sustainable. This review study explains that although several scientific studies have been conducted regarding the socio-economic and ecological importance of Boswellia and Commiphora species, none of them has systematically evaluated the socio-economic contributions of aromatic resins to national and regional economies. However, this study concludes that that proper commercialization and value-chain development of frankincense and myrrh are significant economic incentives to manage the dryland ecosystems sustainably, and that Boswellia and Commiphora species as integrated components of agro-silvo-pastoral systems could significantly contribute to rural livelihoods and improve adaptability to climate change in the Horn of Africa.

Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from a human health perspective been recorded?: Yes, considered unsustainable

Details of assessment carried out: this study

Brief summary on why the use has been assessed/judged to be sustainable or unsustainable: Despite being socio-economically important, and a source of medicinal ingredients, because these species are not ecologically sustainable, the current industrial exploitations of these resources cannot be sustainable. This review study explains that although several scientific studies have been conducted regarding the socio-economic and ecological importance of Boswellia and Commiphora species, none of them has systematically evaluated the socio-economic contributions of aromatic resins to national and regional economies. However, this study concludes that that proper commercialization and value-chain development of frankincense and myrrh are significant economic incentives to manage the dryland ecosystems sustainably, and that Boswellia and Commiphora species as integrated components of agro-silvo-pastoral systems could significantly contribute to rural livelihoods and improve adaptability to climate change in the Horn of Africa.

Has an assessment (or judgement) of sustainability of the use of the target species from an animal health/welfare perspective been recorded?: not recorded


Recommendations provided in the record to maintain or enhance the sustainability of the use of the target species

National investment programmes are needed to enhance value addition and market development and to stop the decline of the Boswellia and Commiphora resource base. These trees are valuable agents for enhancing community resilience and adaptation under the threat of negative effects of global climate change. The existing aromatic resin value chains are thus mainly intermediary buyer-driven chains, led by big traders. It should be possible to enhance the bargaining power of aromatic resin collectors by encouraging their own associations to play an active role in market price determination. Farmers’ adoption of Boswellia and Commiphora species as economic tree crops in the Horn of Africa has a distinct role in biodiversity conservation and climate change adaptation by contributing to the sustainability of ecosystem functioning as well as improving household incomes and the rural livelihood security in general, and thereby facilitating poverty alleviation. Sustainable management, clear political will, and scientific and development programmes that could promote the socio-economic significance of aromatic resin value chains at different levels are urgently needed.


Record source

Information about the record source: scientific_pub

Date of publication/issue/production: 2019-01-01T00:00:00+0000

Source Reference(s):

Hassan, B. A., Glover, E. K., Luukkanen, O., Kanninen, M., & Jamnadass, R. (2019). Boswellia and Commiphora Species as a resource base for rural livelihood security in the Horn of Africa: a systematic review. Forests, 10(7), 551.

Date of record entry: 2023-01-10