Harvesting_African Teak_Tanzania

Affiliation
IIED
Type of wild species covered by the record
Wild species used in its natural habitat
Stage of the value chain covered by the record
Primary Producer/harvester (e.g., NTFP collectors, egg collectors)
Record Source
Scientific publication (e.g., journal articles and book chapters independently peer-reviewed)

Assessing the sustainability of harvest of Pterocarpus angolensis in Rukwa Region, Tanzania

Decreasing
Is the species endemic HIDE
No
Population Status
Uncommon but wildly distributed
No formal international protection in place
National Level
Unknown/not recorded
Population Trend
Unknown/not recorded
Sub-national Level
Unknown/not recorded
Additional Details (if available)

The species is overexploited for its timber which has caused many local populations to become diminished. This exploitation endangers those large trees that are of harvestable size (Takawira-Nyenya 2005). The current harvest of the timber is unsustainable one study showed that if current rate of timber extraction (5.6% per annum) continued in Northern Province, South Africa, all exploitable timber would be gone within the next 30 years (Desmet et al. 1996). Big trees are now rarely seen and there are not thought to be enough small trees to replace these, immature trees are even being harvested to bridge the gap in some (but not all) places (Geldenhuys 2013). The reduction in large trees reduce the amount of seed being produced (Shackleton 2002) but the impact this has on the potential viability of the tree in the future is not currently known.

The species is intrinsically threatened by its poor germination (Boaler 1966) and low seedling survival rate (Takawira-Nyenya 2005). Seedlings will often be browsed by animals putting them at risk and both trees and seedlings are damaged by elephants within the region. The species is also threatened by a fungus (Fusarium oxysporum) that causes dieback known as Mukwa blight or mukwa dieback (van Wyk et al. 1993).

Name
Emma Hemmerlé
Scientific Name
Pterocarpus angolensis
Common Name(s)
African Teak
Wild Teak
Kiaat
Umvangazi
Type of Use
Extractive (i.e., the entire organism or parts of the organism are removed from its environment)
If extractive, for the target species, is this use
Lethal
Does this use involve take/extraction of
The whole entire organism
Details of parts/products taken

Trees are hand cut, rolled to saw pits, sawn into logs and then removed by truck to a train depot;

Are specific characteristics/traits being targeted?
Unknown/not recorded
Purpose of Use
Basic subsistence (meeting day to day essential needs)
Income generation from trade at individual or household or community
Largescale commercial exploitation for trade
Additional Details (if available)

In Tanzania, P. angolenesis wood is widely utilized for furniture, veneer, carving and general purpose timber; In South Africa, the sap is used traditionally for treatment of ringworms and ulcers, eye treatment against cataracts, malaria, blackwater fever and skin inflammation, and urinary schistosomiasis;

What is the main end use for any living organisms, parts or products taken/extracted?
What is the trend in the level of offtake within the period covered by this record?
Additional Details (if available)

in Msaginia Forest Reserve (MFR), Settlements and cattle grazing are forbidden in the Forest Reserve but selective harvest of P. angolensis is carried out under license. In practice, most tree cutters spend months in the Forest Reserve and illegally hunt mammals there.
within Katavi National Park (KNP) No temporary or permanent settlements are allowed aside from Park headquarters and two outlying ranger posts; no livestock, beekeeping, hunting, fishing or timber extractions are tolerated. Tanzania National Park rangers conducting vehicle and foot patrols enforce these laws.

Geographic Location
Country
Tanzania
Sub region/state
Rukwa Region, western Tanzania
Site Description

The study site was in and immediately south of Katavi National Park (KNP), latitude 68450 –78050 S, longitude 308450 –318250 E at the north end of Rukwa Valley in Rukwa Region, western Tanzania. The second area is Msaginia Forest Reserve (MFR), adjacent and north east of the Park;

Ownership
Unknown/not recorded
Is the use part of a strategy to generate conservation incentives, to finance conservation, or to improve tolerance/stewardship?
Unknown/not recorded
Is there evidence that the use is affecting the conservation status of the species? HIDE
Yes – use is negatively affecting the status (e.g., population is declining; extraction effort is increasing)
Is there evidence that the use is affecting natural selection?
Unknown/not recorded
Is there evidence that the use is affecting poaching of illegal wildlife trade?
Unknown/not reported
Is there any evidence that this use of the species is having a knock-on effect on the status of non-target species
Unknown/not recorded
Unknown/not recorded
Details of assessment carried out

Results showed that adult P. angolensis are being removed very rapidly given its slow growth rate as determined from tree ring data, and that regeneration both inside and outside the protected area is very low. A simple model indicates that current harvest is unsustainable raising serious concerns about the long-term viability of this important hardwood species in miombo woodland

Has a valuation of financial flows from this use at the site/national/international level been recorded
No
Contribution to GDP
Unknown/not recorded
Medicine/healthcare
Training/Skills
Land/Resource Rights
Decision Making
Social Cohesion
Conflict- people
Conflict- wildlife
Climate Change
Details of assessment

In the MFR, We cannot predict when economic extinction will occur within this system, but we can say that the population is heading toward economic extinction rapidly. Discussions with loggers suggest that they believe that there is approximately 5 years to go before they will be forced to leave the area;

Has the use of the species been recorded as resulting in changes to human health in this record?
Unknown/not recorded
Has the species in use been noted as being of particular disease risk to humans?
Unknown/not recorded
Has the use of the species resulted in changes to animal welfare in this record?
Unknown/not recorded
Are there particular practices which have increased the risk to human or animal health or welfare in the use of this species?
Unknown/not recorded
Does the use of this species increase susceptibility to pathogen spread?
Unknown/not recorded
Unknown/not recorded
Biological characteristics of target species
Present
Source Reference(s)

Schwartz, M., Caro, T., & Banda-Sakala, T. (2002). Assessing the sustainability of harvest of Pterocarpus angolensis in Rukwa Region, Tanzania. Forest Ecology And Management, 170(1-3), 259-269. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00774-5

Results showed that adult P. angolensis are being removed very rapidly given its slow growth rate as determined from tree ring data, and that regeneration both inside and outside the protected area is very low. A simple model indicates that current harvest is unsustainable raising serious concerns about the long-term viability of this important hardwood species in miombo woodland

Who is involved in the use?
Is there any gender/age specificity in the various roles
Unknown/not recorded
How many of these local jobs accure to the following categories?
How many people outside the local area are employed
Is there any evidence of other economic benefits associated with this use beyond direct income and jobs
Unknown/Not recorded
Does the site have any designations? HIDE
Scale of Assessment
IUCN National Red List Category
IUCN Global Red List Category
Green Status Global Category
Yearly Financial Flows
Yes, considered unsustainable
Yes, considered unsustainable
Country reference