Captivity_Asian Elephants_Myanmar

Affiliation
IIED
Type of wild species covered by the record
Wild species sourced from the wild but reared/cultivated in a managed site (e.g., cultivated wild specimens, eggs/juveniles from the wild)
Stage of the value chain covered by the record
Unknown/not recorded
Record Source
Scientific publication (e.g., journal articles and book chapters independently peer-reviewed)

Modeling population viability of captive elephants in Myanmar (Burma): implications for wild populations

Decreasing
Is the species endemic HIDE
No
Population Status
Unknown/not recorded
Formal international protection in place
International Level
National Level
Formal national protection in place

In 1995, after signing CITES, Myanmar banned all wild elephant captures.

Population Trend
Unknown/not recorded
Sub-national Level
Unknown/not recorded
Additional Details (if available)

The challenges confronting elephant conservation in most elephant Range States are habitat loss and fragmentation, human–elephant conflict, and poaching and illegal trade of elephants;

Name
Emma Hemmerlé
Scientific Name
Elephas maximus
Common Name(s)
Asian elephant
Type of Use
Non-Extractive
Are specific characteristics/traits being targeted?
Unknown/not recorded
Purpose of Use
Basic subsistence (meeting day to day essential needs)
Income generation from trade at individual or household or community
Additional Details (if available)

most captive elephants in Myanmar are used in logging operations

What is the main end use for any living organisms, parts or products taken/extracted?
Amount
6000.00
Units Of Measurement
number of elephants used as work animals in Myanmar
Time period over which this has been recorded
2008
What is the trend in the level of offtake within the period covered by this record?
Provide Details of resource rights regime where relevant

In 1995, after signing CITES, Myanmar banned all wild elephant captures. How- ever, elephants are still captured in areas where human– elephant conflict requires mitigation. Frequently herds of 10, 20 or more are removed from conflict areas and trained as working elephants.

Geographic Location
National / local private sector
Is the use part of a strategy to generate conservation incentives, to finance conservation, or to improve tolerance/stewardship?
No
Is there evidence that the use is affecting the conservation status of the species? HIDE
Yes – use is negatively affecting the status (e.g., population is declining; extraction effort is increasing)
Is there evidence that the use is affecting natural selection?
Unknown/not recorded
Is there evidence that the use is affecting poaching of illegal wildlife trade?
Unknown/not reported
Is there any evidence that this use of the species is having a knock-on effect on the status of non-target species
Unknown/not recorded
Unknown/not recorded
Details of assessment carried out

Our results demonstrate that the current captive population is not self-sustaining because mortality is too high and birth rates are too low. Our models also suggest 􏰂100 elephants year􏰃1 have been captured in the wild to supplement the captive population. Such supplementation cannot be supported by a wild population of fewer than 4000 elephants. Given the most recent expert estimate of 􏰂2000 wild elephants remaining in Myanmar, a harvest of 100 elephants year􏰃1 could result in extinction of the wild population in 31years.

Has a valuation of financial flows from this use at the site/national/international level been recorded
No
Contribution to GDP
Unknown/not recorded
Medicine/healthcare
Training/Skills
Land/Resource Rights
Decision Making
Social Cohesion
Conflict- people
Conflict- wildlife
Climate Change
Has the use of the species been recorded as resulting in changes to human health in this record?
Unknown/not recorded
Has the species in use been noted as being of particular disease risk to humans?
Unknown/not recorded
Has the use of the species resulted in changes to animal welfare in this record?
Unknown/not recorded
Are there particular practices which have increased the risk to human or animal health or welfare in the use of this species?
Unknown/not recorded
Does the use of this species increase susceptibility to pathogen spread?
Unknown/not recorded
Unknown/not recorded
Biological characteristics of target species
Absent
Source Reference(s)

Leimgruber, P., Senior, B., , Aung, M., Songer, M.A., Mueller, T., Wemmer, C. and Ballou, J.D. (2008), Modeling population viability of captive elephants in Myanmar (Burma): implications for wild populations. Animal Conservation, 11: 198-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00172.x

Our models also suggest 􏰂100 elephants per year􏰃 have been captured in the wild to supplement the captive population. Such supplementation cannot be supported by a wild population of fewer than 4000 elephants. Given the most recent expert estimate of 􏰂2000 wild elephants remaining in Myanmar, a harvest of 100 elephants per year could result in extinction of the wild population in less than 31 years.

Threats/pressures impacting the species at the scale of this record
Who is involved in the use?
Is there any gender/age specificity in the various roles
Unknown/not recorded
How many of these local jobs accure to the following categories?
How many people outside the local area are employed
Is there any evidence of other economic benefits associated with this use beyond direct income and jobs
Unknown/Not recorded
Scale of Assessment
IUCN National Red List Category
IUCN Global Red List Category
Green Status Global Category
Yearly Financial Flows
Other
Human-Wildlife Conflict
Other
NA
Yes, considered unsustainable