Hunting_African elephant_Africa

Affiliation
IIED
Type of wild species covered by the record
Wild species used in its natural habitat
Stage of the value chain covered by the record
Unknown/not recorded
Record Source
Scientific publication (e.g., journal articles and book chapters independently peer-reviewed)

Sustainability of Elephant Hunting Across International Borders in Southern Africa: A Case Study of the Greater Mapungubwe Transfrontier Conservation Area

Decreasing
Is the species endemic HIDE
No
Population Status
Unknown/not recorded
Formal international protection in place
International Level
National Level
Unknown/not recorded
Population Trend
Unknown/not recorded
Sub-national Level
Unknown/not recorded
Additional Details (if available)

Poaching of African Savanna Elephants for ivory is a major cause of individual death and population decline (Wittemyer et al. 2014, Thouless et al. 2016). After a sustained period of intense poaching between the late 1970s and 1989, many African Savanna Elephant populations (e.g., in Kenya, Tanzania, Zambia, Uganda) experienced two to three decades of recovery. Data collected as a part of the CITES Monitoring the Illegal Killing of Elephants programme (MIKE), indicate that poaching significantly intensified across the continent starting in 2008 and peaking in 2011 – an unsustainably high level of poaching has continued into current times in some areas of the continent (CITES 2018, 2019), and may be increasing in some of the historically less-affected southern African populations (CITES 2018, 2019). Rapid land use change by humans is driving the direct loss and fragmentation of habitat for African Savanna Elephants and is an increasing threat to populations across their range; Reported increase in human elephant conflict.

Name
Emma Hemmerlé
Scientific Name
Loxodonta africana
Common Name(s)
African Elephant
African Savanna Elephant
Type of Use
Extractive (i.e., the entire organism or parts of the organism are removed from its environment)
If extractive, for the target species, is this use
Lethal
Does this use involve take/extraction of
The whole entire organism
Are specific characteristics/traits being targeted?
Unknown/not recorded
Purpose of Use
Recreational
Population/area management
Additional Details (if available)

The aim of allocating hunting quotas in terms of problem animal control laws are to deter elephants from entering communal areas and to compensate local communities for damage to crops and property;

What is the main end use for any living organisms, parts or products taken/extracted?
Amount
40.00
Units Of Measurement
bulls >35 years old were killed within Botswana and Zimbabwe combined
Time period over which this has been recorded
2010 hunting season
What is the trend in the level of offtake within the period covered by this record?
Additional Details (if available)

Currently, no common policy exits in quota setting for cross-border species, and each country determines their own quota based on limited data. however, there is no single multi-jurisdictional (cross-border) management authority regulating the hunting of elephant

Geographic Location
Name
Greater Mapungubwe Transfrontier Conservation Area
Site Description

spread across the junction of Botswana, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. The GMTFCA is situated at the confluence of the Shashe and Limpopo Rivers and includes areas from Botswana, South Africa, and Zimbabwe

Local people (e.g., individuals, communities, co-operatives)
National external (individual, groups. e.g., hunters, anglers, photographers, tourists)
International external (individual, groups. e.g., hunters, anglers, photographers, tourists)
If more than one box ticked, please provide more details

mix of trophy hunting by tourists and hunting by local communities for population management.

Is the use part of a strategy to generate conservation incentives, to finance conservation, or to improve tolerance/stewardship?
Unknown/not recorded
Is there evidence that the use is affecting the conservation status of the species? HIDE
Yes – use is negatively affecting the status (e.g., population is declining; extraction effort is increasing)
Is there evidence that the use is affecting natural selection?
Unknown/not recorded
Is there evidence that the use is affecting poaching of illegal wildlife trade?
Unknown/not reported
Is there any evidence that this use of the species is having a knock-on effect on the status of non-target species
Unknown/not recorded
Unknown/not recorded
Details of assessment carried out

At current rates of hunting, under average ecological conditions, trophy bulls will disappear from the population in less than 10 years.
When considering that the majority of mating in an elephant population is done by bulls >35 years old (Poole 1989, Hollister-Smith et al. 2007), and that loosing these bulls can lead to social problems (Slotow et al. 2000), the maximum sustainable yield for social stability within the study area was predicted by the VORTEX model to be about 10 bulls >35 years old per annum. The current levels of trophy hunting are thus unsustainable and far exceed the MSY of the population.

Has a valuation of financial flows from this use at the site/national/international level been recorded
No
Contribution to GDP
Unknown/not recorded
Medicine/healthcare
Training/Skills
Land/Resource Rights
Decision Making
Social Cohesion
Conflict- people
Conflict- wildlife
Climate Change

the absence of older bulls, young bulls increase the frequency and duration of their musth period (Slotow et al. 2000). Abnormal behaviors in these young males, such as elevated aggression, killing people, and killing white rhino (Ceratotherium sinum sinum) have been the result of distorted male age hierarchies

the absence of older bulls, young bulls increase the frequency and duration of their musth period (Slotow et al. 2000). Abnormal behaviors in these young males, such as elevated aggression, killing people, and killing white rhino (Ceratotherium sinum sinum) have been the result of distorted male age hierarchies

Other Socio-Economic Impacts

Excessive hunting will therefore affect photographic tourism within the Limpopo Valley through significantly reduced numbers of big bulls, and could affect the chances of viewing elephants in general

Has the use of the species been recorded as resulting in changes to human health in this record?
Unknown/not recorded
Has the species in use been noted as being of particular disease risk to humans?
Unknown/not recorded
Has the use of the species resulted in changes to animal welfare in this record?
Unknown/not recorded
Are there particular practices which have increased the risk to human or animal health or welfare in the use of this species?
Unknown/not recorded
Does the use of this species increase susceptibility to pathogen spread?
Unknown/not recorded
Unknown/not recorded
Strong community governance/institutions/rights for wildlife management
Present
Supportive policy and legislative framework
Absent
High financial returns from use
Present
Biological characteristics of target species
Present
Establishment and implementation of species and/or area management plan
Present
Source Reference(s)

Selier, S.-A.J., Page, B.R., Vanak, A.T. and Slotow, R. (2014), Sustainability of elephant hunting across international borders in southern Africa: A case study of the greater Mapungubwe Transfrontier Conservation Area. Jour. Wild. Mgmt., 78: 122-132. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.641

Hunting of bulls had a direct effect in reducing bull numbers but also an indirect effect due to disturbance that resulted in movement of elephants out of the areas in which hunting occurred. the elimination of older bulls from elephant populations may negatively affect social cohesion in bull elephant groups

Threats/pressures impacting the species at the scale of this record
Who is involved in the use?
Is there any gender/age specificity in the various roles
Unknown/not recorded
How many of these local jobs accure to the following categories?
How many people outside the local area are employed
Is there any evidence of other economic benefits associated with this use beyond direct income and jobs
Unknown/Not recorded
Does the site have any designations? HIDE
IUCN National Red List Category
IUCN Global Red List Category
Green Status Global Category
Yearly Financial Flows
Yes, considered unsustainable