Keeping_Slow loris_Indonesia

Affiliation
IIED
Type of wild species covered by the record
Wild species used in its natural habitat
Stage of the value chain covered by the record
Unknown/not recorded
Record Source
Scientific publication (e.g., journal articles and book chapters independently peer-reviewed)

Welfare impacts of the illegal wildlife trade in a cohort of confiscated greater slow lorises, Nycticebus coucang

Decreasing
Is the species endemic HIDE
Unknown
Population Status
Unknown/not recorded
Formal international protection in place
International Level
National Level
Unknown/not recorded
Threats/Pressures impacting the conservation of the species
Additional Details (if available)

Because slow lorises (Nycticebus spp.) adapt fairly well to habitats altered by humans, the wildlife trade is thought to be the most critical factor in their decline (Nekaris & Streicher, 2008).

Population Trend
Unknown/not recorded
Sub-national Level
Unknown/not recorded
Additional Details (if available)

This species is collected for use as pets, and the animals are sold throughout Southeast Asia (Nekaris and Bearder 2011; Nekaris and Nijman 2007). The teeth are often pulled, resulting in infection and/or death. If animals survive, lack of teeth makes reintroduction impossible.

Name
Emma Hemmerlé
Scientific Name
Nycticebus coucang
Common Name(s)
Slow loris
Greater slow loris
Type of Use
Extractive (i.e., the entire organism or parts of the organism are removed from its environment)
If extractive, for the target species, is this use
Non-Lethal
Does this use involve take/extraction of
The whole entire organism
Are specific characteristics/traits being targeted?
Unknown/not recorded
Purpose of Use
Largescale commercial exploitation for trade
What is the main end use for any living organisms, parts or products taken/extracted?
Amount
77.00
Units Of Measurement
lorises confiscated in a single instance
What is the trend in the level of offtake within the period covered by this record?
Geographic Location
Country
Indonesia
Unknown/not recorded
Is the use part of a strategy to generate conservation incentives, to finance conservation, or to improve tolerance/stewardship?
Unknown/not recorded
Is there evidence that the use is affecting the conservation status of the species? HIDE
Yes – use is negatively affecting the status (e.g., population is declining; extraction effort is increasing)
Is there evidence that the use is affecting natural selection?
Unknown/not recorded
Is there evidence that the use is affecting poaching of illegal wildlife trade?
Unknown/not reported
Is there any evidence that this use of the species is having a knock-on effect on the status of non-target species
Unknown/not recorded
Unknown/not recorded
Has a valuation of financial flows from this use at the site/national/international level been recorded
No
Contribution to GDP
Unknown/not recorded
Medicine/healthcare
Training/Skills
Land/Resource Rights
Decision Making
Social Cohesion
Conflict- people
Conflict- wildlife
Climate Change
Has the use of the species been recorded as resulting in changes to human health in this record?
Unknown/not recorded
Has the species in use been noted as being of particular disease risk to humans?
Unknown/not recorded
Has the use of the species resulted in changes to animal welfare in this record?
Yes, recorded as negative
Are there particular practices which have increased the risk to human or animal health or welfare in the use of this species?
Unknown/not recorded
Does the use of this species increase susceptibility to pathogen spread?
Unknown/not recorded
Detail of aspects of animal welfare affected

Medical records indicated that in total, 28.6% of the slow lorises died within the first 6 months, mostly due to traumatic injury, and all the infants died. The greatest sources of morbidity were external wounds (33.1% of 166 total medical events) and dental problems (19.3%). Of the surviving individuals, 25.4% displayed abnormal behavior.
The slow lorises were transported without access to food or water, and many were dehydrated upon rescue.The inability to grasp a substrate was likely a great source of distress for the slow lorises during transport and is also a source of stress for slow lorises kept as pets in unsuitable conditions; Forced social proximity to other slow lorises was likely another major source of injury and distress for the slow lorises during transport.

Unknown/not recorded
Biological characteristics of target species
Present
Source Reference(s)

Grace Fuller, Wilhelmina Frederica Eggen, Wirdateti Wirdateti & K. A. I. Nekaris (2018) Welfare impacts of the illegal wildlife trade in a cohort of confiscated greater slow lorises, Nycticebus coucang, Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 21:3, 224-238, DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2017.1393338

Medical records indicated that in total, 28.6% of the slow lorises died within the first 6 months, mostly due to traumatic injury, and all the infants died. The greatest sources of morbidity were external wounds (33.1% of 166 total medical events) and dental problems (19.3%). Of the surviving individuals, 25.4% displayed abnormal behavior.
We have provided medical and behavioral evidence showing that the illegal trade in slow lorises results in violations of welfare that physically and psychologically harm individuals.

Threats/pressures impacting the species at the scale of this record
Who is involved in the use?
Is there any gender/age specificity in the various roles
Unknown/not recorded
How many of these local jobs accure to the following categories?
How many people outside the local area are employed
Is there any evidence of other economic benefits associated with this use beyond direct income and jobs
Unknown/Not recorded
Scale of Assessment
IUCN National Red List Category
IUCN Global Red List Category
Green Status Global Category
Yearly Financial Flows
No assessment recorded
No assessment has been recorded
Country reference