Hunting_Grizzly Bear_Canada

Affiliation
IIED
Type of wild species covered by the record
Wild species used in its natural habitat
Stage of the value chain covered by the record
Unknown/not recorded
Record Source
“Grey” literature (e.g., NGO reports, case studies, non-detriment studies; project documents etc. (not necessarily peer-reviewed))

The NDF process For Ursus Arctos Horribilis (Grizzly Bear) In Canada

Stable
Is the species endemic HIDE
No
Population Status
Common and wildly distributed
Formal international protection in place
International Level
National Level
Formal national protection in place

The prairie populations of grizzly bear are considered ‘Extirpated’ by the national Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC);

Population Trend
Unknown/not recorded
Sub-national Level
Unknown/not recorded
Additional Details (if available)

Although, as a whole, this species is secure with relatively large numbers and an expansive range, many small, isolated subpopulations are threatened due to their low numbers and frequent contact with humans. These small subpopulations tend to be found in remnant wild areas surrounded by more extensive human development. As wide-ranging omnivores, Brown Bears are attracted to areas with available human-related foods; being large and somewhat aggressive, these bears may threaten life and property (often agricultural products) and may be killed as a consequence

Name
Emma Hemmerlé
Scientific Name
Ursus arctos
Common Name(s)
Grizzly Bear
Brown bear
Type of Use
Extractive (i.e., the entire organism or parts of the organism are removed from its environment)
If extractive, for the target species, is this use
Lethal
Does this use involve take/extraction of
The whole entire organism
Are specific characteristics/traits being targeted?
Yes

The majority of harvest is of adult male grizzly bears as they are usually larger and thus generally preferred by hunters as trophy specimens over females. Cubs under the age of two are not hunted.

Purpose of Use
Income generation from trade at individual or household or community
Recreational
Additional Details (if available)

Grizzly bears are highly prized as hunting trophies;

What is the main end use for any living organisms, parts or products taken/extracted?
What is the trend in the level of offtake within the period covered by this record?
Additional Details (if available)

harvest of grizzly bears as hunting trophies is legal with a valid hunting license. Harvest for skins and/pelts is also permitted as long as the specimens are accompanied by valid tags and any necessary interprovincial trade permits.

Provide Details of resource rights regime where relevant

Of the approximately 500 grizzly bear mortalities each year in Canada, about 84% are the result of legal harvest (including harvest by Aboriginal Peoples);; the high value of trophies also results in some degree of poaching and trafficking as indicated by reports of seizures and prosecutions

Geographic Location
Country
Canada
Local people (e.g., individuals, communities, co-operatives)
National external (individual, groups. e.g., hunters, anglers, photographers, tourists)
National / local private sector
Is the use part of a strategy to generate conservation incentives, to finance conservation, or to improve tolerance/stewardship?
Unknown/not recorded
Is there evidence that the use is affecting the conservation status of the species? HIDE
Unknown/not recorded
Is there evidence that the use is affecting natural selection?
Unknown/not recorded
Is there evidence that the use is affecting poaching of illegal wildlife trade?
Unknown/not reported
Is there any evidence that this use of the species is having a knock-on effect on the status of non-target species
Unknown/not recorded
Unknown/not recorded
Details of assessment carried out

In Canada, trophy harvest is sustainably managed by the provincial and territorial jurisdictions in which grizzly bears occur; Harvest of grizzly bears in Canada is primarily for hunting trophies and harvest limits have been set at 1-6% of the population depending on the jurisdiction.

Has a valuation of financial flows from this use at the site/national/international level been recorded
No
Contribution to GDP
Unknown/not recorded
Medicine/healthcare
Training/Skills
Land/Resource Rights
Decision Making
Social Cohesion
Conflict- people
Conflict- wildlife
Climate Change
Has the use of the species been recorded as resulting in changes to human health in this record?
Unknown/not recorded
Has the species in use been noted as being of particular disease risk to humans?
Unknown/not recorded
Has the use of the species resulted in changes to animal welfare in this record?
Unknown/not recorded
Are there particular practices which have increased the risk to human or animal health or welfare in the use of this species?
Unknown/not recorded
Does the use of this species increase susceptibility to pathogen spread?
Unknown/not recorded
Unknown/not recorded
Biological characteristics of target species
Absent
Source Reference(s)

Caceres, C. Fraser, D. (n.d.) NDF Workshop Case Studies
WG 5 – Mammals: The NDF process For Ursus Arctos Horribilis (Grizzly Bear) In Canada.

Threats/pressures impacting the species at the scale of this record
Who is involved in the use?
Is there any gender/age specificity in the various roles
Unknown/not recorded
How many of these local jobs accure to the following categories?
How many people outside the local area are employed
Is there any evidence of other economic benefits associated with this use beyond direct income and jobs
Unknown/Not recorded
Scale of Assessment
IUCN National Red List Category
IUCN Global Red List Category
Green Status Global Category
Yearly Financial Flows
Other
Human Intrusions and disturbances
Other
accidental mortality
No assessment recorded
Yes, considered sustainable
Country reference